the plant is operated under veterinary control;

is operated under veterinary control;

is operated under veterinary control;

The lease imposed obligations on the lessee regarding the preservation and promotion of the multifunctional nature of the Ahoy complex [8].

Regarding the flag link requirement for shipmanagers (Section 5.4. of the Ship Management Guidelines), the Polish authorities pointed out the obligation for shipowners to fly under the Polish flag is also fully applicable to shipmanagers.

These alternative materials have to comply with the safety requirements set out for food contact materials.

When choosing methods, the principles of replacement, reduction and refinement should be implemented through a hierarchy of the requirement to use alternative methods.

It is appropriate to allow authorised EU AIFMs to manage non-EU AIFs without marketing them in the Union without imposing on them the depositary requirements and the requirements relating to the annual report provided for in this Directive, as those requirements have been included for the protection of Union investors.

All experiments (both on animals and in laboratory) will be carried under respect of biosafety and biocontainment conditions already applied at the CRL for avian influenza.

The facilitation of service provision has to be ensured in the context of respect for public health and safety and consumer protection.

criteria should be foreseen for the movement of goods provided for in this Regulation in order to ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health.

That Regulation laid down, in particular, criteria for participation so as to avoid registration of fictitious operators.

The investigation has shown that importers of Coke 80+ impose criteria for, inter alia, size and moisture and that upon arrival of the purchased product in the Community, control measurements are made by the importer to ensure that these criteria are respected.

First, the Restructuring Guidelines provide that it is only firms in difficulty fulfilling the express criteria in points 4 to 8 of the 1999 Restructuring Guidelines or in points 9 to 13 of the 2004 Restructuring Guidelines which are eligible for restructuring aid. Those rules set criteria for defining what constitutes a firm in difficulty.

This should not prevent institutions from paying, on shares that have differentiated or no voting rights, distributions that are a multiple of those paid on shares which have relatively higher levels of voting rights, provided that, irrespective of the level of voting rights, the criteria for Common Equity Tier 1 instruments are met, including those relating to the flexibility of payments, and provided that where a distribution is paid it is to be paid on all shares issued by the institution concerned.

This will only be possible if criteria are met, and if it is certain that any distortions of competition will be offset by the benefits flowing from the firm’s survival […] and, in principle, there are adequate compensatory measures in favour of competitors’.

Under point 28 of the guidelines, restructuring aid can be allowed only if criteria are met and if it is certain that any distortions of competition will be offset by the benefits flowing from the firm’s survival, in particular where it is clear that the net effect of redundancies resulting from the firm going out of business would exacerbate local, regional or national employment problems or exceptionally, where the firm’s disappearance would result in a monopoly or a tight oligopolistic situation.

According to point 28 of the guidelines, aid for restructuring can be granted only if criteria are met and if it is certain that any distortions of competition will be offset by the benefits flowing from the firm’s survival, particularly where the net effect of redundancies resulting from the firm going out of business would exacerbate local, regional or national employment problems or, exceptionally, where the firm’s disappearance would result in a monopoly or tight oligopolistic situation.

This will only be possible if criteria are met, and if it is certain that any distortions of competition will be offset by the benefits flowing from the firm's survival…and that, in principle, there are adequate compensatory measures in favour of competitors.’

This will only be possible if criteria are met, and if it is certain that any distortions of competition will be offset by the benefits flowing from the firm's survival (for instance, where it is clear that the net effect of redundancies resulting from the firm’s going out of business, combined with the effects on its suppliers, would exacerbate employment problems or, exceptionally, where the firm's disappearance would result in a monopoly or tight oligopolistic situation) and that, in principle, there are adequate compensatory measures in favour of competitors.