Accordingly, in the opinion of , the fact that the payment of the revaluation for under-compensation occurred a posteriori does not call into question its conclusion that the parameters on the basis of which the compensation of EUR 53,48 million is calculated were clearly established in an objective and transparent manner prior to the performance of public service tasks.

after the entry ‘’, the entry ‘CYPRUS’ is inserted;

in the part concerning , the entry for the port of Brest is replaced by the following:

in the part concerning , the entry for the port of Boulogne is deleted;

in the part concerning , the entry for the port at Sète is replaced by the following:

In the part concerning , the entries for the local units are replaced by the following:

According to , the policy will be targeted both at local shipowners and at national and international markets, the general aim being to restore the confidence of the clients who dealt with the three subsidiaries in the past.

In the opinion of Armateurs de , the judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 January 2007 in Case C-251/04 is not relevant for the activities in question as it does not exclude cable-laying or dredging activities from maritime transport.

According to , the plan was financed by the public authorities.

According to the information provided by , the temporary authorisation of biocidal products containing malathion was necessary in view of the rapidly developing epidemic of dengue in French Guiana.

Lastly, the Commission noted that, by reducing the production costs of undertakings in this sector that were established in , the tax credit was liable to strengthen their position relative to their European competitors.

Therefore, in the case of Ireland, it is advisable to raise the threshold to EUR 8000 and, in the case of , the threshold for the divisions Guadeloupe, Martinique and La Réunion should be set at EUR 15000.

According to , the customs data for the overseas departments shows that their products also suffered the effects of the oil pollution and there was therefore no reason to exclude them from the support provided by the Government.

The Alpine biogeographical region referred to in Article 1(c)(iii) of Directive 92/43/EEC comprises the Union territories of the Alps (Germany, France Italy, Austria and Slovenia), the Pyrenees (Spain and ), the Apennine mountains (Italy), the northern Fennoscandian mountains (Finland and Sweden), the Carpathian mountains (Poland, Romania and Slovakia) and the Balkan, Rila, Pirin, Rhodope and the Sashtinska Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria), as specified in the biogeographical map approved on 20 April 2005 by the Committee set up by Article 20 of that Directive, hereinafter the ‘Habitats Committee’.

The Alpine biogeographical region referred to in Article 1(c)(iii) of Directive 92/43/EEC comprises the Union territories of the Alps (Germany, France Italy, Austria and Slovenia), the Pyrenees (Spain and ), the Apennine mountains (Italy), the northern Fennoscandian mountains (Finland and Sweden), the Carpathian mountains (Poland, Romania and Slovakia) and the Balkan, Rila, Pirin, Rhodope and the Sashtinska Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria) as specified in the biogeographical map approved on 20 April 2005 by the Committee set up by Article 20 of that Directive, hereinafter the ‘Habitats Committee’.

The Alpine biogeographical region referred to in Article 1(c)(iii) of Directive 92/43/EEC comprises the Union territories of the Alps (Germany, France, Italy, Austria and Slovenia), the Pyrenees (Spain and ), the Apennine mountains (Italy), the northern Fennoscandian mountains (Finland and Sweden), the Carpathian mountains (Poland, Romania and Slovakia) and the Balkan, Rila, Pirin, Rhodope and Sashtinska Sredna Gora mountains (Bulgaria), as specified in the biogeographical map approved on 20 April 2005 by the Committee set up by Article 20 of that Directive, hereinafter the ‘Habitats Committee’.

According to the latest information supplied by , the amount of aid provided by the French Republic to Sernam from the time of its conversion into subsidiaries was €489.1 million. This amount is composed of €6.7 million initial capital, €419.6 million capital transaction, €33.5 million equity loan and €29.3 million corresponding to additional costs for railwaymen.

According to , the amount of EUR 6495164 needed by SORENI is to be financed by grants and loans provided from the public and private sources specified in Table 2 below.

in , the ‘Caisse des dépôts et consignations’,

in , the 'Caisse des dépôts et consignations';